An aromatherapy massage intervention on sleep in the ICU: A randomized controlled feasibility study.

We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial exploring the effect of aromatherapy massage on sleep in critically ill patients. Patients were randomized to receive aromatherapy massage or usual care, and feasibility of recruitment and outcome data completion was captured. Sleep (depth) was assessed through Bispectral Index monitoring and self/nurse-reported Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaires, and the Sleep in the ICU Questionnaire. Thirty-four patients participated: 17 were randomized to aromatherapy massage and 17 to control. Five participants who received the intervention completed outcomes for analysis (alongside eight controls). A larger study was deemed unfeasible in this population, highlighting the value of testing feasibility of complex interventions, such as massage for sleep in ICU.

SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting?

OBJECTIVES: The SafeSpace study codesigned and tested a virtual reality (VR) intervention, incorporating relaxation and compassionate mind training to determine acceptability/feasibility in an oncology setting and evaluate impact on physical/psychological well-being and quality of life. DESIGN: A two-phase study. Phase I determined key characteristics using an experienced-based codesign approach. Phase II evaluated the intervention using various measures and qualitative interviews in a mixed methods approach. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse measures data and framework analysis to analyse interviews. SETTING: A specialist cancer centre, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 11 in phase I and 21 in phase II. Participants were in cancer treatment, recovery or palliative care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: Primary outcome: acceptability of the intervention, assessed by >60% uptake of three sessions. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: impact on psychological well-being using EQ-5D/QLQ-C30, Profile of Mood Scale, Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, Depression and Anxiety Severity Scale 21, Self-Compassion Scale, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire and a locally developed questionnaire to capture self-compassion post use. Physiological impact was assessed by change in heart rate (HR)/HR variability and electrodermal activity (EDA). RESULTS: Twenty participants (mean age=48.7 years; SD=16.87); 65% (n=13) completed three sessions. Mental well-being improved following each use and from baseline to after session 3 (VR 1-z=2.846, p≤0.01; VR 2-z=2.501, p≤0.01; VR 3-z=2.492, p≤0.01). There was statistically significant difference in mean scores for EDA at mid-session and post session compared with pre session (F (1.658, 4.973)=13.364, p<0.05). There was statistically significant reduction in stress levels from baseline to post session 3. Participants found the intervention acceptable and highlighted areas for development. CONCLUSION: The intervention is acceptable and feasible and has shown positive effects on mental well-being/stress in the oncology setting. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings.

Filling the gaps: A mixed-methods study exploring the use of patient diaries in the critical care unit.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of critical illness often take time to recovery physically and psychologically from their critical care experience. There is tentative evidence suggesting that the use of a patient or family led diary with entries by nurses, doctors and allied health professionals may help the patient 'fill in the gaps' by making sense of a time they have forgotten. Many have confused or frightening memories and a diary can aid patients and their families in the recovery after critical illness. AIMS: A mixed methods study including a qualitative exploration of the impact of diaries on critical care patients in order to describe the long-term effects of patient diaries. METHODS: A two phase study including a prospective diary intervention and evaluation and subsequent in-depth interviews, using the principles of Grounded Theory. The instruments, Post Traumatic Stress Score-14 (PTSS-14) and EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L), were used to measured post-traumatic stress symptoms and quality of life in the year after diary. A questionnaire about diary use was completed by participants and content analysis of the diary was also undertaken, alongside basic demographics to explore patient characteristics. FINDINGS: For the 50 patients receiving the diary intervention, those completing a diary evaluation, 95% found them helpful and 90% found it helped fill memory gaps. Mean scores for PTSS-14 (cumulative) at four months and 12 months: 30.5 (SD=10.8) and 25.7 (SD=11.7). Mean EuroQol visual analogue scores at four months and 12 months were 77.8 (SD=14.3) and 71.8 (SD=18.5) respectively. Themes from subsequent interviews with eight patients included: providing holistic care, emotional support and empathy and dealing with loss of control. Data confirmed that whilst diaries had broad value in making sense of the critical care experience and their subsequent recovery, not all were able to read them again. Integrated analysis of four data sources suggested the core themes of the diary revealed its value as: a dynamic communication tool integral to holistic care and person-centredness; a reflection of the impact of a critical care event and a resource that helped give a sense of meaning to what had happened. CONCLUSION: Diaries can offer a means of providing clarity for patients who struggle to come to terms with their critical care experience and subsequent recovery, but should be given to patients with forethought and support. It remains unclear which types of patients might benefit most from diaries.

Understanding how a palliative-specific patient-reported outcome intervention works to facilitate patient-centred care in advanced heart failure: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care needs of patients with chronic heart failure are poorly recognised. Policy makers advise a patient-centred approach to holistically assess patients' needs and care goals. Patient-reported outcome measures are proposed to facilitate patient-centred care. AIM: To explore whether and how a palliative care-specific patient-reported outcome intervention involving the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale influences patients' experience of patient-centred care in nurse-led chronic heart failure disease management clinics. DESIGN: A feasibility study using a parallel mixed-methods embedded design was undertaken. The qualitative component which examined patients and nurses experience of the intervention is reported here. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using framework analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients attended nurse-led chronic heart failure disease management clinics in two tertiary referral centres in Ireland with New York Heart Association functional class II-IV. Nurses who led these clinics were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In all, 18 patients and all 4 nurses involved in the nurse-led clinics were interviewed. Three key themes were identified: identification of unmet needs, holistic assessment and patient empowerment. The intervention impacted on processes of care by enabling a shared understanding of patients' symptoms and concerns, facilitating patient-nurse communication by focusing on these unmet needs and empowering patients to become more involved in clinical discussions. CONCLUSION: This Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale-based intervention empowered patients to become more engaged in the clinical consultation and to highlight their unmet needs. This study adds to the evidence for the mechanism of action of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-centred care and will help inform outcome selection for future patient-reported outcome measure research.